Skip to main content

How Media Control and Ownership Affect Mainstream Media

Mergers and media conglomerates are the by-products of globalization... 

There are some places in the world wherein large corporations are both owners of media stations and other companies with diverse interest.  The idea of influential corporations that own media stations is not that awful if transparency and rigor are observed in all the decisions that involve the media management.  However, most of the time,  large and powerful concentrations of ownership may influence how mainstream media operate. 

But what are some of the disadvantages of mergers and media conglomerates?

. Media Outlet and Corporate Interests
A reality that  may present an adverse influence with regards to media control is when media establishments survive only on advertising fees.  This may lead to the media outlet being affected by corporate interests.  A company that employs the specific media outlet for advertising its products may tend to receive a diverse treatment from the said media outlet because of their economic dependence on them.  Most often, this may affect what is covered and not covered by the media outlet.  For example, when a negative issue that involves a corporation (which is  an important advertising client of the media outlet)  arises, the media outlet in question may tend to “treat” the news in a different manner.  News or issues could end up being biased in order to “protect” the interest of the big and powerful client.

. Interlocking Directorate and Media Control
An interlocking directorate is also an important aspect to consider in relation to media control.  Interlocking appears when a directory of one company sits in a board of another company.   Powerful media corporations often share members of the board of directors with an assortment of other companies like investment companies, real estates, banks, etc. This 
situation may lead to conflict of interests that (eventually and inevitably) is reflected on how the media operate and decide on certain issues.  Furthermore, this situation may likewise affect and sometimes mine the editorial independence of the media outlet.   

. Vertical Integration and Media Decisions
Vertical integration is another concern that can influence all aspects of media decisions.  Vertical integration happens when large media companies have, at the same time, operations and businesses across other industries and verticals.  This can be in the form of distribution networks or retailing. While this is profitable for that specific media company,  the range of news and issues being covered or discussed in the media outlet may be limited and tendentious. This is because the media outlet do not have the interest to cover news that may involve competitors. 

. Censorship and Media Management
I think that the greatest influence that media conglomerates can have on media management is about censorship. This may happen in the form of direct and forthright interference on the political and social ideologies contained in news, magazine articles, movies, even in TV and radio programmes. But most often, this sort of intrusion is done in a subtle level.  Journalists and subordinates learn the habit of following the political and social ideas of the owner.  But whether it is a direct interference or a subtle one, the result is just the same: the media audience are fed with a deformed reality and scanty ideas and opinions. 

As a conclusion, I think that mergers and media conglomerates are one of the by-products of globalization.  Although objectionable for its influence on media management,  it is impossible to stop the merging of huge corporations, the concentration of ownership  and their control over outlets of expression.  For this reason, media users should always bear in mind that a lot of factors are involved on how certain issues are covered and treated by media outlets.  And as a consequence, media’s definition of reality is likely to be angled and tendentious.


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Communication Models in Communication for Development

Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners... Communication models are conceptual models used to explain and describe the human communication . Communication models, approaches and theories are the foundation around which development communication practitioners build ideas on how to effectively transmit the message they would like to convey to the target audience. Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners because they provide ideas on how individuals react to different types of communication stimulus, the possible consequences that may result when participants in a communication process employ a communication style or shift to another communication style. In addition, communication models and approaches provide practitioners an idea on how to obtain engagement, collaboration and participation from the target audience in order to achieve communication goals. Communication models, approaches and theories are v

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication... Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives.   E lihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.   This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.   Blumler and Katz

Concept of Cultural Hegemony According to Antonio Gramsci

When Antonio Gramsci talks about hegemony, he refers to the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society.. . It was the Italian Marxist philosopher  Antonio Gramsci  who introduced the concept of “cultural hegemony”. In the  Selections from the Prison Notebooks  (1999), Gramsci argued that power is based on the presence of two elements: force and consensus.  If force triumphs over consensus, dominion is obtained.  On the other hand, if consensus prevails, hegemony exists. Thus, for Gramsci, hegemony is grounded essentially on consensus.  And this consensus is achieved by means of persuasion.   Persuasion  in all its forms is thereby used to convince that a specific political or cultural idea is better than the others or is “the only way” to view the world.  It is noteworthy to emphasize that   hegemony,  for Gramsci, is the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society, applied  through the various st