Skip to main content

Trends and Possibilities in Science Communication

One of the objectives of science communication is to make specific, jargon-laden information produced by scientists into content that non scientists can easily grasp and comprehend...

One of the objectives of science communication is to make specific, jargon-laden information produced by scientists into content that non scientists can easily grasp and comprehend. Currently, science communication or, in particular, science writing  requires a working knowledge of diverse skills, from journalism to communication, to multimedia and literary arts (Science Writing, 2017) . 

With the onset of the information and communication technologies, the structure of the public communication system has been transformed, leading to the emerging trend on the part of audiences to prefer and turn to the online media to satisfy their information needs (Peters, 2013).  As technical and financial limitations to address the public directly online have largely vanished, more science organizations and individual scientists have resorted to the use of the new communication sphere like websites, blogs, social media sites (e.g. Facebook and Twitter),  and Youtube to communicate science to their respective audiences.  

There are several reasons why online-based platforms are growing in popularity. For communicators who write in the context of science, online-based platforms provide the possibility to have an increased control over the whole process of content communication.  According to many scholars, these new communication platforms also provide a more symmetrical type of communication, which may lead to the increased participation of the layman in scientific debates and on debates related to various ethical, legal and social implications of scientific activities. Others view this type of communication as more effective in relation to convincing or instructing the audience towards a particular viewpoint.  Still others consider the participation of the layman as essential to increase public support (Peters, 2013).  

On the other hand, for communicators who write about science, it is more easier to hunt for scientific articles to write about via the various journals, websites and blogs that are free and accessible online. Furthermore, the diversity of types of media platforms make it possible to write about science using various perspectives: the current trend is to write stories about science in a personal mode. As Carl Zimmer has emphasized, science is part of the story or behind the story, but not anymore the lead (as cited in Levine, 2014).

Although public communication by means of online-based platforms is the current trend, it is still unclear whether these platforms will finally replace or merely complement the traditional media platforms. However, others underlined the current economic crisis of the traditional journalistic media as the expression of the prevailing new communication environments, which are able to provide unlimited information on a large number of issues for free and with relatively little effort.

Due to the growing popularity of internet-based communication platforms, it is therefore necessary for science writers to have the capacity to craft effective content both for the traditional media and the expanding digital media. It is also essential for science writers to have a grasp of multimedia to adapt themselves and to thrive in this ever changing and growing digital environment.

Levine, D. (2014). 4 science journalists on the (r)evolution of science journalism. In Elzevir. Retrieved from
Peters, H.P. (2013). Gap between science and media revisited: Scientists as public communicators. In PNAS. 110(Suppl 3) doi. 10.1073/pnas.1212745110
Science Writing. (2017). In John Hopskins University. Retrieved from 
Science and Environmental Journalism: Trends, boundaries, and opportunities for a rapidly evolving industry. Retrieved from


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Communication Models in Communication for Development

Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners... Communication models are conceptual models used to explain and describe the human communication . Communication models, approaches and theories are the foundation around which development communication practitioners build ideas on how to effectively transmit the message they would like to convey to the target audience. Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners because they provide ideas on how individuals react to different types of communication stimulus, the possible consequences that may result when participants in a communication process employ a communication style or shift to another communication style. In addition, communication models and approaches provide practitioners an idea on how to obtain engagement, collaboration and participation from the target audience in order to achieve communication goals. Communication models, approaches and theories are v

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication... Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives.   E lihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.   This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.   Blumler and Katz

Concept of Cultural Hegemony According to Antonio Gramsci

When Antonio Gramsci talks about hegemony, he refers to the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society.. . It was the Italian Marxist philosopher  Antonio Gramsci  who introduced the concept of “cultural hegemony”. In the  Selections from the Prison Notebooks  (1999), Gramsci argued that power is based on the presence of two elements: force and consensus.  If force triumphs over consensus, dominion is obtained.  On the other hand, if consensus prevails, hegemony exists. Thus, for Gramsci, hegemony is grounded essentially on consensus.  And this consensus is achieved by means of persuasion.   Persuasion  in all its forms is thereby used to convince that a specific political or cultural idea is better than the others or is “the only way” to view the world.  It is noteworthy to emphasize that   hegemony,  for Gramsci, is the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society, applied  through the various st