Skip to main content

Construction of Reality Theories

Culture and social interaction are important factors on how people construct reality...



The study of communication has always been a dynamic process. Over the years, various ideas, perspectives and frameworks have been developed and introduced to maximize its potentials and to adapt itself to the evolving global society. The mainstream view is that culture and social interaction via verbal and non-verbal communication are influential factors on how people construct knowledge and reality. This blog explores the theories that show the driving forces that link together culture and communication. 

1. The Symbolic Interaction Perspective

The Symbolic Interaction Perspective, also known as symbolic interactionism,  is an important framework that came from the sociological theory. This is based on the assumption that symbolic meanings that people develop and (depend upon)  are the end-results of the process of social interaction.

It was George Herbert Mead (1863-1931), sociologist and pragmatist philosopher, who founded the symbolic interactionism theory.  In reality, however,  the term “symbolic  interactionism” was coined by Mead’s student Herbert Blumer, who elaborated Mead’s thoughts subsequent to his death.

The study on symbolic interactionism focuses on how people define their social reality, and how they (people) comprehend themselves via social interaction with others. It also analyzes society by pointing its lens on the subjective/personal meanings that individuals confer to actions or conducts, events and objects.

 Subjective meanings are given primary importance because it is considered that individuals’ reactions or conducts are based on what they deemed as true and not what is objectively true.  People deduce and interpret another person’s conduct and by means of these interpretations social bond is created. Interpretations are called ‘the definition of the situation’.

According to the symbolic interactionism theory: 

·         Social reality is not permanent – people are always building and re-building the various meanings of their social lives through social interaction.

·         Symbols are an essential component of interaction – verbal communication such as spoken or printed words and non-verbal communication such as gestures are the expressions of social life. This is because they facilitate the creation of shared meanings between persons. Yet, these shared meanings may differ depending on the social context.

Mead believed that through symbolic interactionism, individuals cease to be passive agents governed by societal ties. Instead, they are co-actors who actively control the way in which they perceive and live social reality. 

The Social Construction of Reality Theory

The Social Construction theory or Social Constructionism focuses on the various process by which people mutually construct their knowledge of the world. Supporters of this theory presume that the creation of knowledge, significance and meanings are a coordinated effort between individuals and not just within an individual.  Knowledge and meanings emerge through the process of social interaction. 

The term ‘social constructionism’ was introduced in Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann’s book The Social Construction of Reality. However, its origins came from the American pragmatism and symbolic interactionism.

The important assumptions of this theory are the following:

·        1 . the assumption that human beings recognize their experience by building a model of the social world and how it operates and, 

·        2 . that language is the most significant system through which individuals build reality. 

The social construction of reality is, therefore, a continuing dynamic process that is repeated by people who operate basing on their subjective interpretations and understanding of reality.

As a conclusion, the creation of knowledge, significance, meaning and/or social reality is a coordinated effort between individuals who are always building and re-building the various meanings of their social life by means of social interaction. 


Related Post:



References:

. Franzoi, Stephen L. "Symbolic Interactionism." Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. Ed. Roy F. Baumeister and Kathleen D. Vohs. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2007. 961-963. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 9 Sept. 2015.

URLhttp://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX2661100556&v=2.1&u=phupou&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w&asid=c9016b104a6a5100940a3f587834f9ca

Leeds-Hurwitz, Wendy. "Social Construction of Reality." Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Ed. Stephen W. Littlejohn and Karen A. Foss. Vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Reference, 2009. 891-894. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 9 Sept. 2015.

URLhttp://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CCX3201900301&v=2.1&u=phupou&it=r&p=GPS&sw=w&asid=2b112618b70f136ba71bcfbcb467029a

Comments

Popular Posts

Importance of Communication Models in Communication for Development

Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners... Communication models are conceptual models used to explain and describe the human communication . Communication models, approaches and theories are the foundation around which development communication practitioners build ideas on how to effectively transmit the message they would like to convey to the target audience. Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners because they provide ideas on how individuals react to different types of communication stimulus, the possible consequences that may result when participants in a communication process employ a communication style or shift to another communication style. In addition, communication models and approaches provide practitioners an idea on how to obtain engagement, collaboration and participation from the target audience in order to achieve communication goals. Communication models, approaches and theories are va

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication... Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives.   E lihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.   This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.   Blumler and Katz

Fighting Air Pollution in Metro-Manila Philippines

Air pollution is one of the most pressing challenges that Metro-Manila is facing today... Statement of the Issue Air pollution is one of the most pressing challenges that Metro-Manila is facing today. According to the report released by the Department of Environment and Natural  Resources’ Environment and Management Bureau (DENR-EMB), the air quality situation in the National Capital Region in the first quarter of 2015 was even worse than that of the end of 2014 (as cited in Metro-Manila’s Air…, 2015). While the maximum safe level of total suspended particulates (TSP) of air pollutant concentration was 90 micrograms per normal cubic meter (ug/NCM), monitoring data revealed that the total TSP reached 130 ug/NCM, higher than the 106 per normal cubic meter recorded at the end of 2014.   The World Health Organization 2006 Report showed that, pollution, especially from airborne particulate matter (PM), has serious adverse health effects which are being experienced by urban