Skip to main content

Interpretative and Interaction Theories of Communication

Meaning and interaction are closely intertwined in the communication process...

Meaning and interaction constitute the communication process. All types of communication are grounded on meaning and interaction, which, at the same time, are closely intertwined.

The Interpretative and Interaction theories consider communication as a process of dynamic interchange through which individuals interact with other individuals, interpreting, sharing  and defining  their perception of reality by means of this interaction. The Interpretative and Interaction theories also consider the relationship of individuals with media channels.

The Interactional approach of Paul Watzlawick is involved in an interpersonal type of communication. Watzlawick's theory is grounded on the following 5 suppositions:

1. People are always communicating. This means that even if we remain silent or we prefer not to utter a word, or not do anything, we are still and always communicating. We never stop communicating. Gestures, facial expressions and other body movements make up a great part of the communication process. They are non-verbal type of communication that impacts interaction.

2. People communicate using both digital and analogical methods. Digital commmunication may refer to objects by name. Language is considered to be digital. On the other hand, analogical methods consider objects by likeness. Non-verbal communication is considered analogical.

3. Communication is synonymous to content and relationship. Content is the purpose, the message, the aim of the source in starting the communication process, while relationship is the manner in which this purpose has been conveyed.

4. The quality of the relationship is based on the manner in which communication participants deal with the communication flow.  As people communicate, the sender and receiver interpret the message sent and received in different ways. And the interpretation they give to the message depends largely on their culture, behavior and beliefs in life.

5. Communication can be complementary or symmetrical. Complementary type of communication means communication participants have diverse power. On the other hand, symmetrical type of communication means commnication participants have equal power.

The Interpretative and Interaction approach also believe that all types of communication should take into account the socio-cultural background in which people live.

Related Posts:


Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Communication Models in Communication for Development

Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners... Communication models are conceptual models used to explain and describe the human communication . Communication models, approaches and theories are the foundation around which development communication practitioners build ideas on how to effectively transmit the message they would like to convey to the target audience. Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners because they provide ideas on how individuals react to different types of communication stimulus, the possible consequences that may result when participants in a communication process employ a communication style or shift to another communication style. In addition, communication models and approaches provide practitioners an idea on how to obtain engagement, collaboration and participation from the target audience in order to achieve communication goals. Communication models, approaches and theories are v

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication... Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives.   E lihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.   This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.   Blumler and Katz

Concept of Cultural Hegemony According to Antonio Gramsci

When Antonio Gramsci talks about hegemony, he refers to the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society.. . It was the Italian Marxist philosopher  Antonio Gramsci  who introduced the concept of “cultural hegemony”. In the  Selections from the Prison Notebooks  (1999), Gramsci argued that power is based on the presence of two elements: force and consensus.  If force triumphs over consensus, dominion is obtained.  On the other hand, if consensus prevails, hegemony exists. Thus, for Gramsci, hegemony is grounded essentially on consensus.  And this consensus is achieved by means of persuasion.   Persuasion  in all its forms is thereby used to convince that a specific political or cultural idea is better than the others or is “the only way” to view the world.  It is noteworthy to emphasize that   hegemony,  for Gramsci, is the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society, applied  through the various st