Skip to main content

Difference Between Social Problem and Social Change

Social changes can be fostered by addressing the pervasive social problems that impede development...





Social problems are conditions that are deemed negative, conditions in which individuals, communities and societies are affected. Social changes denote modification or transformation from a specific condition to another condition. In other words, social change is an ongoing process that can be unprompted (a result of the evolving times) or planned.

Development is a goal that societies would like to achieve. Since it is a goal, then planned and collective actions and initiatives are implemented to foster development. At the same time, these planned and collective actions have also their own respective objectives, the primary of which to promote positive social changes that may eventually lead to development.

But how can social changes be fostered?

Social changes in communities or societies as a whole can be fostered by addressing the pervasive and interrelated social problems that impede positive social changes to happen. Social problems can be addressed by identifying and eradicating its root causes. A big challenge since social problems are commonly interrelated in nature and so as its root causes. So, development per se is a process of social change in societies. A social change that should be people-centered focusing on the welfare of people rather than a question of growth rates or numbers.

For example, one of the pressing challenges facing the Philippine society today is poverty. Poverty is a social problem that needs major attention by the Philippine government. According to figures from the Philippine Statistics Society, the poverty incidence registered during the first semester of 2015 was 26.3 percent, some points higher compared to that of 2014. This means that about 11.4 million Filipinos are living in conditions that are below the poverty line.

It is vital for the Philippine government to address poverty because it is a social problem that affects every aspect of everyday life, a problem that impedes development. Poverty brings out other problems like malnutrition among children. Education is also largely affected by poverty. Many poor families are unable to send their children to school because they do not have the financial means to provide the necessary materials and to support their children while they are at school.

 Individuals who were not able to have an appropriate education may end up unemployed or doing low-income jobs that can make them feel frustrated of life. And because of this, they may also experience discrimination. Since they are frustrated and desperate of their living condition, they may
also end up having vices or doing criminal acts just to survive.

As a conclusion, it is crucial for societies to address social problems in an effort to achieve development. Social problems can only be eradicated by promoting actions and initiatives that may, in turn, foster planned social changes that can empower individuals in societies.

References:
.Ongkiko, I.V.C. and Flor, A. (2003). Introduction to Development Communication. SEAMEO Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture and the UPOU

. Poverty Incidence Rises in the Philippines. (2015). In ABS-CBN News. Retrieved from http://news.abs-cbn.com/business/03/06/15/poverty-incidence-rises-philippines


Comments

Popular Posts

Fighting Air Pollution in Metro-Manila Philippines

Air pollution is one of the most pressing challenges that Metro-Manila is facing today...



Statement of the Issue
Air pollution is one of the most pressing challenges that Metro-Manila is facing today. According to the report released by the Department of Environment and Natural  Resources’ Environment and Management Bureau (DENR-EMB), the air quality situation in the National Capital Region in the first quarter of 2015 was even worse than that of the end of 2014 (as cited in Metro-Manila’s Air…, 2015). While the maximum safe level of total suspended particulates (TSP) of air pollutant concentration was 90 micrograms per normal cubic meter (ug/NCM), monitoring data revealed that the total TSP reached 130 ug/NCM, higher than the 106 per normal cubic meter recorded at the end of 2014.  
The World Health Organization 2006 Report showed that, pollution, especially from airborne particulate matter (PM), has serious adverse health effects which are being experienced by urban populations in bot…

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication...



Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives. 
 Elihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.
Blumler and Katz  [4]and Rossi [5] discussed t…

Theories on Mass Media and the Construction of Reality

Media attribute its own meaning to the content being channeled to its target audience...





Over the years, the mass media have assumed a prevailing role in the global society by becoming the key source of regular and incessant flow of data, images and information.  People have become heavily dependent on the media, receiving big quantities of news and all kinds of information.
When people access information by means of the mass media (or through the eyes of the mass media) the media attribute its own meaning or logic to the content itself, generating in the process its interpretation of the issue involved.  As it channels the specific content to the public/audience, it obviously imposes that kind of logic to them.  
Thus, reality constructed and imposed by the media to its audience does not necessarily mean the real one, since media content is the result of the work of reporters and opinionists, who are also being influenced by their respective convictions and beliefs: their own systems o…