Skip to main content

Definition and Assumptions of the Agenda-Setting Theory

The agenda-setting theory explains the correlation between the emphasis that the media attribute to issues and the consequent importance that media users may accord to such issues.





The agenda-setting theory describes a very powerful influence of the media, which is the ability to tell people what news are important or not. The agenda setting-theory is the creation of public awareness and concern of salient issues by the news media. 

The mass media has become the dominant means through which individuals and social groups receive a permanent and intense stream of data, facts and ideas. When this flow of information is transmitted  through the mass media, it consequently proposes certain meanings, building a certain image about the world. Thus, the values, hierarchies, social norms and ideas promoted by the media, and/or the meanings determined by them can influence the way media users think.

Originally formulated by Maxwell McCombs in 1972, the agenda-setting theory explains the correlation between the emphasis that the media attribute to issues and the (eventual) importance that media users may accord to such issues. In essence, the agenda-setting theory describes the powerful influence of the media to tell media users what issues or news are salient to their lives: a sort of the creation of public awareness and concern of prominent issues by the media.

The two basic assumptions that underlie most research on agenda-setting theory are the following:

. media do not reflect reality, instead they filter and shape it;
. media concentration or emphasis on selected issues or news leads media users to perceive those as more important than other issues.

In particular, the news media selection and presentation of news and issues provides a sort of funnel that assists media users to decide where, exactly to place their attention. This is because media users can recognize the relative significance of a menu of issues based on how much emphasis or coverage the media give to them. 

As a conclusion, as a result of the poweful influence of the media on the creation of public awareness and concern of salient issues,  the agenda-setting theory may impact not only mass communication and political communication but also the growth and proliferation of diverse organizational communication, persuasion and other innovational theories, in their selection of news or issues to be covered, the manner in which these are covered and its depth of coverage.

Related Posts:



Web References:


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Importance of Communication Models in Communication for Development

Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners... Communication models are conceptual models used to explain and describe the human communication . Communication models, approaches and theories are the foundation around which development communication practitioners build ideas on how to effectively transmit the message they would like to convey to the target audience. Communication models and approaches facilitate the work of practitioners because they provide ideas on how individuals react to different types of communication stimulus, the possible consequences that may result when participants in a communication process employ a communication style or shift to another communication style. In addition, communication models and approaches provide practitioners an idea on how to obtain engagement, collaboration and participation from the target audience in order to achieve communication goals. Communication models, approaches and theories are v

Definition and Assumptions of the Uses and Gratification Theory

The uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication... Framed by Elihu Katz, Jay Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch in the 1970’s, the uses and gratification theory marked a perspective shift in the study of mass communication by turning its attention away from media sources and message and how they affect the audience [1].  Blumler and Katz’s uses and gratification theory considers, instead, the audience not a passive but an active player in their  media choices, and that these choices depend largely on media users’ apparent needs, wishes or motives [2], and that audiences are thereby formed based on their similarities of wishes, needs and motives.   E lihu Katz [3] first introduced the uses and gratification perspective when he came up with the idea that individuals make use of media to their advantage.   This perspective surfaced in the 1970’s when Blumler and Gurevitch persisted in expanding the idea.   Blumler and Katz

Concept of Cultural Hegemony According to Antonio Gramsci

When Antonio Gramsci talks about hegemony, he refers to the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society.. . It was the Italian Marxist philosopher  Antonio Gramsci  who introduced the concept of “cultural hegemony”. In the  Selections from the Prison Notebooks  (1999), Gramsci argued that power is based on the presence of two elements: force and consensus.  If force triumphs over consensus, dominion is obtained.  On the other hand, if consensus prevails, hegemony exists. Thus, for Gramsci, hegemony is grounded essentially on consensus.  And this consensus is achieved by means of persuasion.   Persuasion  in all its forms is thereby used to convince that a specific political or cultural idea is better than the others or is “the only way” to view the world.  It is noteworthy to emphasize that   hegemony,  for Gramsci, is the hegemony of a specific “dominant social group or groups” over the whole society, applied  through the various st